【哲】 本体论论证。比较<Bold>COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT</Bold> 和<Bold>TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT</Bold>.
-
On this ground, the ontological argument is rejected.
由于这种原因本体论的论证遭到了摈斥。
-
If this is correct, then all versions of the ontological argument fail.
如果这是正确的,那么,本体论的争论的所有版本失败。
-
He is most famous for his influential ontological argument for God's existence.
他是最有名的,他有影响的本体论的论据,上帝的存在。
-
In the fourth Way, Aquinas offers a version of the Ontological Argument (see Anselm).
在第四种证明中,阿奎那提出了一种新版本的本体论证明(参见安瑟姆的观点),侧重于展示事物不同的品质。
-
The second "proof" of God's existence is usually called the ontological argument.
上帝存在的第二个“证明”通常称为本体存在论。
-
Anselm's ontological argument or William Rowe's complex version of a probabilistic argument from evil.
的本体论进行论证,或是罗威廉William Rowe复杂版的有关邪恶的概率论证。
-
Finally, this paper focus on discuss the relation between the ontological argument and belief in God.
最后,集中论述本体论论证与信仰上帝的关系。
-
The ontological argument as a transcendental argument is about the existence of a rational proof of God.
本体论论证是关于对上帝存在进行理性证明的一种先验论证。
-
Anselm's most famous response to this challenge was to become famously known as' the ontological argument for.
安瑟伦对于这些学生的挑战最出彩的回应便是那令他流传后世的本体论证明,他提出的该证明也成为了许多年来最受关注的哲学问题之一。
-
The classical arguments for God's existence are the five ways of Thomas Aquinas and the ontological argument of Anselm of Canterbury.
经典的争论上帝的存在是安瑟伦的五个方面的托马斯·阿奎那本体论的争论和。
-
Up to now, when we evaluate any of existence theory, we regard it as a most basic standard if it can solve the problem of the ontological argument.
至今,当我们评价任何一个存在理论时,都将其能否合理地解释本体论论证中的问题作为一个最基本的标准。
-
Versions of Anselm’s ontological argument were later used by both St. Thomas Aquinas and Rene Descartes and were, much later still, heavily criticised by Immanuel Kant.
安瑟伦的本体论证明在之后被圣托马斯·阿奎那和笛卡儿所引用,但也被康德大力批判。
-
The paper critically inspects the functionalism and the argument about it, we deem it should not excessively extreme at the ontological problem of mind. Basing on…
文章通过对功能主义及其引起的相关争论的批判性反思,认为在关于心的本体论问题上不应过于极端化。
-
The paper critically inspects the functionalism and the argument about it, we deem it should not excessively extreme at the ontological problem of mind. Basing on the premise...
文章通过对功能主义及其引起的相关争论的批判性反思,认为在关于心的本体论问题上不应过于极端化。