The practice of peremptory challenge in other counties shows that it can protect the litigants' procedural rights and safeguard the justice of procedure.

无因回避制度在域外的实施情况表明：该制度可以更好地保障当事人的诉讼权利，维护诉讼程序的公正性。

This paper is mainly consisted of four parts. Chapter one introduces the basic ideas of the peremptory challenge, its practice in some foreign countries and the controversy of this system.

本文主体包括四部分：第一章主要介绍无因回避制度的基本概念，该制度在一些国家的实施情况和域外对于该制度的存废之争等内容。

This paper argues the necessity of establishing the peremptory challenge from the point of oughtness and analyzes the feasibility from the view of practice.

本文从应然的角度阐述移植无因回避制度的正当性和必要性，又从实然的视角对建立无因回避制度进行可行性论证。

To change the status quo of the ruling challenge system, this paper argues that it's feasible to establish the peremptory challenge in China's criminal procedural law.

笔者认为要改变我国现行回避制度处于虚置状态的可行途径是在刑事诉讼中建立无因回避制度。

This paper comes to the conclusion that it is necessary and feasible to establish the peremptory challenge in China.

在我国刑事诉讼中建立无因回避制度具有客观必要性和现实可行性。

This paper aims to introduce the peremptory challenge, study the coherence between it and Chinese judicial system, analysis the necessity and feasibility of its establishment.

本文旨在介绍无因回避制度的基本概况，考察其与我国具体国情、司法现状、法治理念等的契合度，论证合理引进无因回避制度精髓的必要性和可行性。

With the establishment of the peremptory challenge, the litigants will enjoy a wider range of procedural rights, the criminal procedure and verdict will be more justify.

无因回避制度在刑事诉讼中的确立有助于赋予被告人更广泛的诉讼权利，体现其诉讼主体地位，也有利于确保诉讼程序和裁判结果的公正性。